The older Europeans thought he had done the right thing whereas the younger ones thought it was not worth it since the coolie was worth nothing before an elephant. Over everything else it shows that the imperialists have achieved everything meaningless there in Burma.
The Burmese people and their oppressors were not into a cordial relationship which is evident from the account Orwell presents.
He is also known journalist for his thoughts on politics. It is to keep the readers focused on the core of the topic which is the moral dilemma and guilt that Orwell personally feels while serving the British empire.
The British have failed to tame the locals which could have been possible, had they tried love instead of tyranny and tried to form trustful relationships with them.
Apart from the evils of imperialism, it is also a very personal essay in which Orwell expresses how he personally sees things and how he cannot support the evil of imperialism.
History had enough examples of empires violating not just human rights, but intervening forcefully into other countries, robbing their natural resources, and suppressing its people for the sake of their own prosperity.
To rise above expectations.
Some of the hatred appears undeserved to him and it is why he is angry at those monks. If it was not for the violence they perpetrated the hatred inside the natives would have been less strong. The beast had appeared there suddenly and picked the man by his trunk before grinding him with his feet.
Orwell felt the pressure from thousands of natives to shoot the elephant. One of the tones that are used in the narrative is Resentment.
He was not an experienced hunter and did not know where to shoot the animal so aimed for its forehead where he thought its brain was. What followed was both tragic and comic; childish and serious.
Because legally it was the right thing to do and how the indians looked up to him as if he was their hero, instead of being mocked or made a fool of.
However, he had done it solely to avoid looking a fool before natives and wondered if any of the Europeans could have guessed that.
Orwell was worried he could hardly do anything but then he decided that he must see.
At last left with no alternative, Orwell got down on the road and aimed at the elephant. What is the most powerful symbol in the essay? Rather than talking of Burma or imperialism, it is about his personal feelings on both and how they affect him. The English wanted to be respected and while visibly the local people respected them, they would not do so behind their backs.1 Shooting an Elephant George Orwell (c.
) IN MOULMEIN, IN LOWER BURMA, I was hated by large numbers of people--the only time in my life that I have been important enough for this to. Shooting An Elephant is one of those important essays that deal with the life Orwell experienced in Burma apart from ‘A Hanging’.
In these essays he reveals that part of. Shooting an Elephant study guide contains a biography of George Orwell, literature essays, quiz questions, major themes, characters, and a full summary and analysis.
Start studying Shooting an Elephant by George Orwell questions. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools.
- George Orwells Shooting an Elephant In George Orwell's essay "Shooting An Elephant," he writes about racial prejudice. Orwell is a British officer in Burma.
The author is, "for the Burmese and all against their oppressors, the British"(). Shooting an Elephant: The Death of Free Will George Orwell’s essay, Shooting an Elephant, was first published in in the autumn issue of New Writing, a London periodical.
According to Adrian De Lange, Shooting an Elephant is one of Orwell’s most famous essays (Bloom 9).Download